Installed libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.07-1 (source i386)
Installed:
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.diff.gz
replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.06-1.diff.gz
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.dsc
replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.06-1.dsc
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.deb
replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.06-1.deb
libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07.orig.tar.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/interpreters/libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07.orig.tar.gz
replacing libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.06.orig.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 04:07:20 -0700
Source: libterm-readline-gnu-perl
Binary: libterm-readline-gnu-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Darren Stalder <torin@daft.com>
Description:
libterm-readline-gnu-perl - Perl module to use GNU Readline library
Closes: 41868 41677 42018
Changes:
libterm-readline-gnu-perl (1.07-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version.
* Use correct LDLOADLIBS line. Thanks to Manish Singh <yosh@gimp.org>
for this. Fixes Bug#41868,#41677,#42018.
Files:
417117fb334c44e4aa8a53055b488d41 684 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.dsc
f2e64f7b3d3c5430a4884f0e47a95792 53469 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07.orig.tar.gz
b57b74e5c845893c5a257a17f8cb6a62 2282 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1.diff.gz
6e9ab7114ca49934e1cc81af10c57162 67230 interpreters optional libterm-readline-gnu-perl_1.07-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBN7AKBI4wrq++1Ls5AQE5DQP/b1+RB7LBlS+eeAOWesi/xTKZJ6fPcbC5
7NAeBvTt+e0qnTi3cDnSKvQLcUub8AbUAiHtFTCif/jG9Hfy6dQcNN4aEPgwuHIY
LBcfFc7sVQycAJpFMbRm/PxYHLhmrkP2HRSMwlr1Zc3Gs1DBkPSl4vezTSij6TSO
/FLACVNdyOg=
=UCdo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: