[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed libgc4 1:4.14-0.4 (source i386)



Installed:
libgc4-dev_4.14-0.4_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/devel/libgc4-dev_4.14-0.4.deb
  replacing libgc4-dev_4.13-2.deb
libgc4_4.14-0.4.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/libs/libgc4_4.14-0.4.diff.gz
  replacing libgc4_4.14-0.3.diff.gz
libgc4_4.14-0.4.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/libs/libgc4_4.14-0.4.dsc
  replacing libgc4_4.14-0.3.dsc
libgc4_4.14-0.4_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/libs/libgc4_4.14-0.4.deb
  replacing libgc4_4.13-2.deb
libgc4_4.14.orig.tar.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/libs/libgc4_4.14.orig.tar.gz
  replacing libgc4_4.14.orig.tar.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 14:32:18 -0400
Source: libgc4
Binary: libgc4 libgc4-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:4.14-0.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Description: 
 libgc4     - Conservative garbage collector for C
 libgc4-dev - Conservative garbage collector for C (development)
Changes: 
 libgc4 (1:4.14-0.4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * non-maintainer upload
   * added epoch -- I don't understand why this wasn't already in this
     changelog?  Without this, the i386 version was rejected; fixed some
     stuff in debian/rules to properly handle epoch
   * libgc4-dev conflicts with bigloo less than 2.0e-1, since that package
     had a libgc.so symlink in it
   * postinst: installed in libgc4-dev also, to run ldconfig (lintian)
Files: 
 dbb4e758ab23b1398053fa61d9f955d8 624 libs standard libgc4_4.14-0.4.dsc
 2b852a33443116dbaa163494fd423027 322313 libs standard libgc4_4.14.orig.tar.gz
 06adf105d5ed7d5933091f4f560593d9 5435 libs standard libgc4_4.14-0.4.diff.gz
 0b274bbaac94416cb2edc0d8a529e90c 42828 libs standard libgc4_4.14-0.4_i386.deb
 1009bf0e8f7d8f2c63671bb6d3e0fd6f 141524 devel standard libgc4-dev_4.14-0.4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBN5tav4/8QF79WmfNAQFMugP/QkjU/rRXhZmOpDHJZ5EHDlC/0cNaxOjF
BraEuu7jISpBdivxfz9fhxRvqNPAVIOWLVJXOgd2ny+pd2gv2eS6SlHXCzL8r/eO
86l/TN+DSlMkmufU/qtK0OPy0H/XwNK6WRNcL8l0DpPrJM6puthTBfn8A9Z96MTn
XZUa+zRfuGk=
=6LHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: