[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded imlib 1.9.4-5 (alpha) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:12:28 -0500
Source: imlib
Binary: imlib-progs imlib-base imlib1 gdk-imlib1 imlib-dev gdk-imlib-dev
Architecture: alpha
Version: 1.9.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: AlphaBuildd/John Goerzen <buildd@complete.org>
Description: 
 gdk-imlib-dev - Header files needed for Gdk-Imlib development
 gdk-imlib1 - Gdk-Imlib is an imaging library for use with gtk
 imlib-dev  - Header files needed for Imlib development
 imlib-progs - Configuration program for Imlib and GDK-Imlib
 imlib1     - Imlib is an imaging library for X and X11
Changes: 
 imlib (1.9.4-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Updated dependencies for imlib1 and gdk-imlib1 so that imlib-base gets
     updated.  Previously, the old 1.8.1 imlib-base package wouldn't get
     updated to the 1.9.4 package since there was no explicit dependency on
     the new package.  The new package is needed due to the conffile move
     from /etc/im to /etc/imlib.
   * Added informative message to the imlib-base preinst script about the
     conffile move to /etc/imlib.
   * #ifdefed out the "Imlib Init" message in `Imlib/misc.c'.  It appears
     that I accidentally lost the original patch during my imlib
     updates. (#39122)
   * Corrected spelling in README file.  (#38876)
Files: 
 79ecbb9d4ffb55ce826a4929bdd9ed2c 250518 graphics optional imlib-progs_1.9.4-5_alpha.deb
 6e811808d87ebb4d6e67cca3c253710f 80982 graphics optional imlib-dev_1.9.4-5_alpha.deb
 a8820a333e92efda3136428ebe9846a2 63364 graphics optional imlib1_1.9.4-5_alpha.deb
 7a6cae3136f1dec0a5156fb4dfa7dcf5 86746 graphics optional gdk-imlib-dev_1.9.4-5_alpha.deb
 89c1613850a025215c81a69bb58f1c3b 71844 graphics optional gdk-imlib1_1.9.4-5_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQEVAwUBN3GoKdYJEdzpssC9AQHdJwgAna71zhz5Jlpo2BagFlQ/L0AaqniO0GSg
zWnMAnyB5xZxegygzBBLCpdmxUyN5+/JhPJuv1I6UjOBuKRc8EgoYzhECaWdFE0U
ucwiOg2z0vKRTX4s/0XP5DwyFv3KTQ951RhEn2S7KY7JeO9jpgS/tH9LyQjB0Hfc
6wIDB6Azwl9/s8kMc7fKwVaZJ/CZjKnUJRQdwxYg2H4BJU1MprLXKShheajoGVko
R+cQ1C1lbsMRLqCkPR+Z6gZ0bXTLeuToBCEvp2lXz9Erhpu1SIzRsd9o3QQ6SeWK
wyLCEtkLxQVK+sz2JWl2kllCPlqK/LdJLvijLjfDTIv6LgjXiih6vg==
=jRpD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: