[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded dictd 1.4.8-10 (alpha) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 19:46:07 -0400
Source: dictd
Binary: dictd dict
Architecture: alpha
Version: 1.4.8-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd@complete.org
Description: 
 dict       - Dictionary Client
 dictd      - Dictionary Server
Changes: 
 dictd (1.4.8-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Compiled with libc6_2.1.1-7 (potato)
 .
   * Patched servscan.l and clientscan.l to fix misaligned error messages.
     Patch by Kirk Hilliard <kirk@debian.org> - fixes 37326
 .
   * Simplified dictd script.  Set interpreter to /bin/ash for testing,
     then to /bin/sh for release.
 .
   * Added prerm script
 .
   * Reordered sequence of foldoc,jargon and elements dictionaries in
     dictd.conf.
 .
   * Patched libmaa/hash.c to fix int/long mix up on Alpha.
     Patch by Nikita Schmidt <cetus@snowball.ucd.ie> - fixes #36636
 .
   * Patched libmaa/hash.c to remove compiler warnings introduced by
     libc6_21. Patch by Kirk Hilliard <kirk@debian.org>
 .
   * Corrected format in /etc/init.d files to comply with console message
     standard - fixes #35519 and #36919
 .
   * removed spurious `F' from /etc/init.d.dictd - fixes #35126 and #35519
Files: 
 1a4f904f8bc4dc1ca21d9d96ec0131ca 160030 Text Optional dictd_1.4.8-10_alpha.deb
 174f9e52758671a1ef865e241591e094 59220 Text Optional dict_1.4.8-10_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQEVAwUBN1F4AtYJEdzpssC9AQGTvAf8DQu0bIfs6/w3xlgf3sgaS0BM6ZFCEFCt
H3KTSnCIOHcNfZOz7yNaKEz3Y7MPInv4+lCBxB9H6z0S6P0BM7P/7cEtEQPSQ++D
O++yx5XEKwYKoMgglJT3Y1NHMYFIJDulSaRceSCJYgFSHBplzKdptQ0/GvlG4XhI
O+paUSlqpA5dYtcp1MEvRGFYSUQdPnJExzR10+S5NDICLcYvXVCFM3sTXoXVSB5C
IvUAHqxHI36jv9W6XgI/rIEoae7alYnSnovpNqPdKeJREnS+gPgeySWIfZLAJl/v
ex6oO0BEqZ4VQ4USFzRxzZE9esmIz5pHjsAjdX51QDOAOD+i2qrl6g==
=SqMm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: