[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gnomehack 1.0.2-1 (sparc) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Tue,  4 May 1999 10:39:20 -0600
Source: gnomehack
Binary: gnomehack
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian SPARC Build Daemon <buildd@marcus.seva.net>
Description: 
 gnomehack  - NetHack for Gnome (and console) -- a D&D-style adventure game
Changes: 
 gnomehack (1.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version (i.e. I'm cutting a new release today :)
   * Many usability improvements.
      * Finally(!) got the strange seg-fault fixed -- many, many thanks
        to Tony Taylor <tonyt@ptialaska.net>.  (Tony, you rock!)
      * No more gtk/gnome errors when the game ends.
      * The top-10 scores now show up when the game ends.
      * The RIP window when the game ends is much nicer now.
      * When stats increase, the show in green for a few turns.  When
      * they decrease hey show in red.
      * Added in a "pet mark" (a heart) to help you distinguish your
        pets from other monsters.
      * Reworked the map window code so that zooming in and out is now
        really fast (and doesn't use malloc any more).
      * Updated some key handling to be more correct.
      * Dialogs now default to "Ok" instead of "Cancel" when appropriate.
      * Added key handling to dialog boxes (like Yes/No).
      * Worked around a bug in gnome_dialog_set_parent.
      * Menu dialogs (like inventory) have much better formatting.
      * Fixed a long standing off-by-1/2 bug in the map window code.
Files: 
 614a6a47ce7e5425e53a38d1c20217ef 1276544 games optional gnomehack_1.0.2-1_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNzm4lio9WkFm9rsJAQGe0gP8C9YBqqoLv+FPZD2ZUN5/d5XeeTpCWbkn
OwUf+EWVrx81+uVKcqUkoGcydK6l2X2Pzt1zjkC91Wpj5y54aIOvs26ImOpZtKwy
6MnQLaqXLoTlsEt+HOsisBX6KzP1ENpdq3usks+gBlJg9ghRW62w3aInrnur/WV0
95MY0DHMIlI=
=ldeZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: