[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded bsdmainutils 4.5 (powerpc) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 04:00:07 +0000
Source: bsdmainutils
Binary: bsdmainutils
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 4.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/PowerPC Build Daemon <buildd@powerpc.debian.org>
Description: 
 bsdmainutils - More utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite.
Changes: 
 bsdmainutils (4.5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Implement -t option in calendar: give only today's events.  Fixes bug
     14117, "calendar feature request: "today only" switch".
   * Thanks to Jason Henry Parker <henry@freezer.humbug.org.au>, implement
     -n option: don't treat Friday specially.
   * Moved calendar files from /usr/lib/calendar to /usr/share/calendar.
   * /usr/lib/calendar/default is no longer a conffile.  Instead,
     /etc/calendar/default is the default calendar file, and
     includes /usr/share/calendar/standard-default.  Fixes bug 33905,
     "/usr/lib/calendar/default is a config file and should live in /etc".
   * ul.c: use a dynamically-sized buffer; ul can now handle lines as
     long as you care to feed it.  Fixes bug 31730, "ul suffers from
     buffer overflows".
   * Changed Hungarian holidays according to information from Karoly
     Lorentey.  Fixes bug 33978, "Hungarian Holidays".
   * Eliminated __linux__ conditionals.  Fixes bug 32247, "Patch to move
     from Linux to Unix compatibility".
   * Applied patch from bug 34723 to make write access utmp only through
     libc calls.
   * Renamed changelog.Debian.gz to changelog.gz, making the package
     Lintian-clean.
Files: 
 1c9683e73862e1f0bf861998b01abf71 139446 utils important bsdmainutils_4.5_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNwDs8mlCJl9IkOrZAQHxFwL/S0HTwxTVEbnwoll/LpB3NgoxrlwRm6xH
crnEIfWSF/vZ6tq4YPWPMpLXzbDMjt9mCNcBNuDyxoYcqbmBt+x8uhrPX0Gp4afj
kVGWt5aYIJbLa81TUHzGKojd+gv0QEdK
=pEDo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: