[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded wdm 1.0-3 (powerpc) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 12:27:08 -0600
Source: wdm
Binary: wdm
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 1.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/PowerPc Build Daemon <buildd@powerpc.debian.org>
Description: 
 wdm        - WINGs Display Manager
Changes: 
 wdm (1.0-3) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Modified a bunch of stuff to get this working with the new X
     setup. Mimics new xdm setup and configuration.
   * debian/Xsession: merged changes from xbase's Xsession. Reads
     /etc/X11/Xsession.options.
   * debian/config/Xaccess: copied from stock /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess.
   * Stole Branden's xdm.options.5 and renamed it to wdm.options.5
   * debian/wdm.options: modified to reflect actual path (/etc/X11/wdm)
   * debian/preinst: modified to used pidof instead of start-stop-daemon
     (I don't trust wdm to respond to signals properly -- I'll talk with
     the author about this)
   * debian/prerm: ditto
   * debian/init: ditto
   * debian: moved several files into debian/config.
   * debian/config/Xsession: thought about changing as suggested in "noexec
     /home" thread in debian-devel, but I'll wait for Branden on this
     one. If the changes are important, I'll release them with 1.0-4.
   * debian/rules: modified a couple of somedir/* constructs. Replaced them
     with more complex 'find -type f | grep -v /CVS/' to get wdm to build
     right on the working CVS tree.
   * debian/rules: remove generated .spec file (why would I want that in
     the Debian diff? <g>)
   * debian/control: added 'Suggests: xmodmap'
Files: 
 21dd8498e7308937a57e189d52a41e7b 309862 x11 extra wdm_1.0-3_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNnpoKmlCJl9IkOrZAQHCvgL6A5aW1NL26/1cq6YsmzuUqiDpv/rD6S/+
zTS+KNNnjMpHmHtHHZDUeJ0/o+8dv0HCCa/thTImXDgaG0qGR4dNw/V+0RwxTiUz
10km2rbyQaNQrP+wM03Lr32DYEIvGe+T
=t1dr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: