[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded libgtop 0.26.2-3.1 (source i386) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:03:12 -0800
Source: libgtop
Binary: libgtop-dev libgtop-daemon libgtop1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.26.2-3.1
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: jim@jimpick.com
Description: 
 libgtop-daemon - gtop daemon for monitoring remote machines (part of Gnome)
 libgtop-dev - Dev libraries for gtop system monitoring library (part of Gnome)
 libgtop1   - Libraries for gtop system monitoring library (part of Gnome)
Changes: 
 libgtop (0.26.2-3.1) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Upload to frozen, corrects Bug #29110, Bug #29111, which were
     already fixed.
   * Noticed that guile option is no longer being used, so I removed
     the dependency.
   * Added changelog (to fix lintian error).
   * Changed control file to use macro substitutions.  This is a much
     less error-prone way of building dependencies than doing them by
     hand.
   * Added -V option to dh_makeshlibs to put version number on shlibs
     file.
   * Added shlibs.local file with null entry for "libgtop 1" (and
     others) so libgtop1 doesn't declare a relationship on itself.
Files: 
 2ca84db010ced7d7dc45db8acb0275a6 658 - optional libgtop_0.26.2-3.1.dsc
 f36043d21f30186d89e62c5bf6eb85ca 13208 - optional libgtop_0.26.2-3.1.diff.gz
 85236fb0672a3772d1cfb0eca6bf11ca 103888 devel optional libgtop1_0.26.2-3.1_i386.deb
 677e6602a801324466eaf0b1395d319f 44420 devel optional libgtop-dev_0.26.2-3.1_i386.deb
 04a0f06a2de33bef04b6a01ff0a7ca86 7728 utils optional libgtop-daemon_0.26.2-3.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNlxrH+Qz770qyIfJAQHsKgP+LMwbd2RRiruMf0Emf1RkpNmsKY2JkuHz
t80+0aSi072Q5+ujtT4Uj2drGY5qOcNg/QqP26U/xqr3x/EjmER0fJihlo9xsw4Q
q8pkuukApKfLBkTFXlK+w2Fa8NxMAn4htRJKEhu3Dafs/2XIaWFFWlPK95Bl9hr/
PcFapzyoyf8=
=TnSi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: