[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded pwdb 0.54preD-3 (powerpc) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 00:08:35 +0100
Source: pwdb
Binary: libpwdb0g-dbg libpwdb-doc libpwdb0g-dev libpwdb0-altdev libpwdb0g libpwdb0
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 0.54preD-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Hartmut Koptein <koptein@et-inf.fho-emden.de>
Description: 
 libpwdb-doc - Documentation for libpwdb
 libpwdb0g  - Password database library for Linux-PAM [libc6]
 libpwdb0g-dbg - Static library with debugging symbols for libpwdb [libc6]
 libpwdb0g-dev - Header files for libpwdb [libc6]
Changes: 
 pwdb (0.54preD-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/rules (binary-libc6): don't install copyright file twice [#14886].
   * debian/postinst: rewritten to use case structure.
   * debian/rules (binary-libc6-dev): strip static library with --strip-debug
     and not --strip-unneeded.
   * debian/rules (binary-libc5-altdev): ditto.
   * debian/rules: removed sparc from the list of architectures that want
     libc5-compat support.
   * debian/rules: each package now has it's own doc directory under
     /usr/doc/, containing at least the copyright file (Policy 5.6).
   * debian/control (libpwdb0g-dev): also conflict with libpwdb-dbg since
     it use to contain /usr/lib/libpwdb.a.
   * debian/shlibs.libc5: change earliest required version to reflect that
     Debian revision 1.1 was never released.
Files: 
 63ab3584c3e51e19929754d33e68f217 47782 libs optional libpwdb0g_0.54preD-3_powerpc.deb
 5d55e2e9df0b3c12d88d816932fcb0ba 67164 devel optional libpwdb0g-dev_0.54preD-3_powerpc.deb
 045434242c21779a0c9faa4f477dd4a7 414882 devel optional libpwdb0g-dbg_0.54preD-3_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQB1AwUBNkt2GWlCJl9IkOrZAQFxDQL/e7ZG/9MXhYmt3NKN3PyREmFLddSFK7Om
jbbDEGajePoNu1fvv7a2KlapwuCh7RM4niWB+/ubmYi9b/Ph+UTmLNnv0AIFHAkk
t67mhfFmjcl2fHa+HEilWvgg1GUoWRc4
=Vji8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: