[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded musixlyr 1.10-2 (source all) to masterscp



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:08:54 -0700
Source: musixlyr
Binary: musixlyr
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.10-2
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org>
Description: 
 musixlyr   - a MusiXTeX extension for handling lyrics
Changes: 
 musixlyr (1.10-2) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * [debian/control]:
       - Upgraded to standards version 2.5.0.0 (no changes).
       - Updated dependencies on tetex* to the latest versions:
           Depends: tetex-bin (>= 0.9.981031-2)
           Recommends: tetex-base (>= 0.9.981030-1)
         due to changes in tetex's directory structure.
   * [debian/rules]: In the latest tetex-base package, /usr/lib/texmf/doc
       is now a symlink to /usr/doc/texmf.  Therefore, we now install
       musixlyr's documentation into /usr/doc/texmf/musixtex/musixlyr.
       Thanks to Julian Gilbey <jdg@maths.qmw.ac.uk> for the bug report.
       (closes: Bug#29327)
   * [debian/postinst]:
       - I copied a few lines from tetex-nonfree's postinst to remove the
         old directory /usr/lib/texmf/doc if musixlyr is the last package
         using that directory, and create a symlink to /usr/doc/texmf.  :-)
       - Added TEXMF='!!$TEXMFMAIN' before mktexupd to ensure that
         mktexupd in tetex-bin_0.9.981031-2 works properly.
Files: 
 f9d57389a67e19ee137fa07f35c48b02 617 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10-2.dsc
 49b4badcb893c05843c46a8328e61415 3692 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10-2.diff.gz
 e0a1dde68d914fe0f894b1cc73bffa39 54640 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNkpxnB1nCwXgpaL5AQGTAQP8CWjwl1yzvnukzDU96sJ8XILC+AFI5FxV
npBi3fuc+TcwS37FlKgSDtGRSJfnjPaV7SZby3VzOe0iv9ocgMNAZEtDmogty+Rf
O+JpxggQEo2Zbfi9Z/fOGbiGeYFn6PIJYSfz2x2J6jUl7OtjCje4jh/SKv9goIxs
HyY/tk3OrdE=
=j0Ei
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: