[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded octave-plplot 0.3-5 (source i386) to chiark



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 11:57:45 +0100
Source: octave-plplot
Binary: octave-plplot
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@icp.inpg.fr>
Description: 
 octave-plplot - PLplot (a scientific ploting library) interface for Octave
Changes: 
 octave-plplot (0.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Changed Description field in debian/control to reflect the change in
     version 0.3-4 as regards the switching between GNUplot/PLplot.
   * Added `(a scientific ploting library)' after `PLplot' in first line of
     the Description field in debian/control (suggested by Christopher
     J. Fearnley <cjf@I21.com>).
   * Included FAQ (which is not in the upstream distrib, but directly sent
     to me by the author).
   * Changed mode of debian/fix-octave-plplot-cc.pl to executable in
     debian/rules (This script was introduce in the previous version
     (0.3-4) but I forgot to mention why in the last changelog.  The reason
     it is needed is because octave_plplot.cc was not compiling anymore
     with the latest release of egcs.  I hope that someday Matwrap will be
     packaged for Debian and the octave_plplot.cc file will be generated at
     package building time).  This was suggested by Paul Slootman
     <paul@debian.org>.
Files: 
 f73edf4a008a2ea1255bd297ed28a63a 645 math optional octave-plplot_0.3-5.dsc
 6753e2b2cd077ef6cc35c18f7ea400b3 8192 math optional octave-plplot_0.3-5.diff.gz
 f17a1d386828ea5502744cf8f0164011 127498 math optional octave-plplot_0.3-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNjb5m2mxawte8xR9AQHjngP/SleB+EZaL4q212S0JGNUwjyFVaOR5ULz
nVtocu2817So/8iEJO2Mn9XrKLfJVdWHczMtH8CHtNw1cCMH0uAi/A0ihdGDd+H8
8mWqnEWZzE9eRXUMyhx1hqdYg2StiqpUcD+VLPpeL4a+/P+yblniESlNPka+f1LL
Cg37k3TG9KY=
=/8wq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: