Uploaded gimp 1.0.2-2 (powerpc) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 10:46:23 -0800
Source: gimp
Binary: gimp libgimp1 gimp-nonfree libgimp-dev
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 1.0.2-2
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/powerpc Build Daemon <buildd@powerpc.debian.org>
Description:
gimp - The GNU Image Manipulation Program
gimp-nonfree - GIF and TIFF support for the GNU Image Manipulation Program
libgimp-dev - Header files for compiling plugins for The GIMP
libgimp1 - Libraries necessary to run the GIMP
Changes:
gimp (1.0.2-2) frozen unstable; urgency=low
.
* The gimp package no longer depends explicitly on xfnt{75,100}. I
downgraded the relationship to a Recommends: and added big fat
warnings in the README and in the package description.
Fixes bugs #14600 and #21055. This has been changed because it's
possible to run GIMP using a remote font server to serve the 75/100dpi
fonts. However, it's really no big deal to ask for them to be installed
locally, so the relationship should be Recommends:.
* The above Recommends: has been changed to xfonts-{75,100}dpi, although
it's pretty silly that their names were changed without adding a
Provides:. *grumble*
* Bumped the version number in the dependancy of gimp on gimp-data-extras
to (>= 1:1.0.0).
* libgimp-dev now conflicts with libglib-dev, so people don't try
compiling plugins when they only have GTK+ 1.1 installed.
Files:
4df909ff14dfea235413954db2dc6dc4 28032 non-free/graphics optional gimp-nonfree_1.0.2-2_powerpc.deb
c813a7e48bc65a617389548915736696 2887102 graphics optional gimp_1.0.2-2_powerpc.deb
5dcfc69bd4c7e3a376c85de1a9f6731e 96046 devel optional libgimp-dev_1.0.2-2_powerpc.deb
beaae9f45129b9ab140921f0fc334830 82524 libs optional libgimp1_1.0.2-2_powerpc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQB1AwUBNjSp0GlCJl9IkOrZAQECKQMAhEGPl3eeaqMJKRGPe7bTd4ECUbLKdLRg
N0O1MDdCkrycsBIkZnJ3MNtENsdzU9RdnjQpgjxUBHHl60e9VMuMW6AGojbKjFAZ
2SxnwCvBGSHQXyoqUHF0wxmkj4MIZbwO
=kuKN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: