[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded bash 2.01.1-4.1 (alpha) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 03:24:03 +0100
Source: bash
Binary: bash-builtins libreadlineg2-dbg bash libreadlineg2-dev libreadlineg2
Architecture: alpha
Version: 2.01.1-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher C. Chimelis <chris@classnet.med.miami.edu>
Description: 
 bash       - The GNU Bourne Again SHell
 bash-builtins - Bash loadable builtins - headers & examples
 libreadlineg2 - GNU readline and history libraries, run-time libraries. [libc6]
 libreadlineg2-dbg - GNU readline and history libraries, debugging libraries. [libc6]
 libreadlineg2-dev - GNU readline and history libraries, development files. [libc6]
Changes: 
 bash (2.01.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * libreadline 2.1-12
   * Rebuild with ncurses4.0 to avoid packages linked with libreadline
     depending on two versions of ncurses; reported by Martin Mitchell
     <martin@debian.org>. [#27762]
   * debian/rl.shlibs: bump versioned dependency to >= 2.1-12.
   * debian/rules (build): add --with-curses to avoid ever linking with
     termcap; reported by, ehm, Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>. [#25118]
Files: 
 36125f48ed2209f77509e5ad2fc44890 490522 base required bash_2.01.1-4.1_alpha.deb
 0796b3c58d403acd4e0dc091c8122099 90164 base required libreadlineg2_2.1-12_alpha.deb
 47bab02fefeac0a3653c821720f5e1cf 192292 devel standard libreadlineg2-dev_2.1-12_alpha.deb
 b3ebfae7cc6e58dd332b133f4d957099 318420 devel optional libreadlineg2-dbg_2.1-12_alpha.deb
 5e7fce0939ea164c514773cbe4d44337 77576 utils optional bash-builtins_2.01.1-4.1_alpha.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNi0ul6FO21jpzc25AQGdDwP+O+HPw0f9YmnmbyDLUE3je6kSEM7h+no1
xKVaukIDzhXmiaaPZPVsHFUAU/DX3eTtZFE21RxP72/fGD01ldOtzEWoc3zn+1AF
1rj3CfFTJSl4+YhIAm60P/axsRsXZIgJKimc+PzhsqQD+Tg3PfLJnXmqVy4BdWvC
+PkVr10y0jM=
=QcQ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: