[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded lintian 0.9 (source all) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 16:34:38 +0200
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
Description: 
 lintian    - Debian package checker
Changes: 
 lintian (0.9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * (frontend/lintian, reporting/html_reports, checks/*, collection/*)
     Make rigorous distinction between source and binary packages.
     Pass "source" or "binary" as second argument to check scripts.
     Report source package tags with "pkg source:" instead of just "pkg:".
     Binary package tags stay the same.
     (The check scripts always report "pkg type:", and the frontend strips
      the type again if it's "binary").
     This involves several changes in the web-report scripts as well.
 .
   * Add command-line options for the things that could only be set via
     environment variables or the configuration file.  (--cfg, --root,
     --lab, --dist, --arch).
 .
   * Really rename obsolete-ldconfig-call-in-postinst to
     postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig.
   * Really rename changelog-file-missing-in-native-debian-package to
     changelog-file-missing-in-native-package
 .
   * (checks/scripts) bltwish now lives in blt8.0, not blt4.2.
Files: 
 ea9337b39abb76a25da0ec47fbd9a147 642 devel optional lintian_0.9.dsc
 a7ced1917c9a6dad8ddb7f52f7b666af 161012 devel optional lintian_0.9.tar.gz
 b5d9a9cc4ba94c110afc32cb8b20ac28 142326 devel optional lintian_0.9_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQDVAwUBNgU4hzI43/W5dqdJAQFiMgYAxeLd4prLRiTHvyzEIorUlGKezdtZ2Tz6
aUde5QK4K82MUfa0m0qpzEsRyZQp5PyTYBRh1YxJhujHCql/nQX+3xPet+MAIHKD
JE/3EKS3y0ESDKwVcfyrpTdYoBWHeTTnD9dEHd5+VvdyvWRhxgusDDQzxqPMDc5k
ejm/4pbXrzhF/jhAimwMlGhbiyZMt7x8HdF9WJKL23eFvoaykyvtA38jBwxe68wj
XcxSwnBC4kc6kLZ1PIn4xW6eVZwdSsxR
=nEQL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: