Uploaded musixlyr 1.10-1 (source all) to masterscp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 17:12:28 -0600
Source: musixlyr
Binary: musixlyr
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.10-1
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org>
Description:
musixlyr - a MusiXTeX extension for handling lyrics
Changes:
musixlyr (1.10-1) frozen unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream official release. (musixlyr 1.1, December 18, 1997)
* [debian/control]: Revised package description;
and revised dependencies to work with Debian 2.0 (Hamm):
Depends: tetex-base (>= 0.9-5)
Recommends: musixtex (>= 1:0.89-2)
Suggests: pmx (>= 1.3.6-1)
* [debian/postinst]: Replaced the obsolete append_db command in
tetex-0.4 with mktexupd in tetex-0.9. postinst in previous versions
(<= 1.02a-2) failed to do its job with tetex-0.9, likely to render
musixlyr unusable for first-time installers unless they run texhash
manually.
* Removed debian/postrm.
* [debian/copyright]: Updated author's e-mail address.
* [debian/rules]: Added "dh_installexamples auxl-exa.pmx".
* Not fair! dpkg thinks that 1.1 << 1.02a! Hence this release is
named v1.10, thus avoiding the epoch. Thanks to Brian White
<bcwhite@debian.org> for the suggestion! :-)
Files:
26966dc78bd9f4cce202b9d2fa0c11db 617 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10-1.dsc
ae7c2a4258da6226bb491a72e0d5e54c 55653 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10.orig.tar.gz
68323b9125d421481ba5d32ca2ef71cf 3241 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10-1.diff.gz
48586a05abd0d38afcf4466602b8d7a6 54122 contrib/tex optional musixlyr_1.10-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNYmfhx1nCwXgpaL5AQGVCwP/cfZppS4/hE54iInkFOtSht7L69dkJfwv
GskYDSvHwrQbE0BGrhKm8QgYNUG5ZJ+pOChShmWTOa/7W7pXRHeJmRdokQhTY7r7
iaNDhhyWdbHjN1Znifuf+1jFb0RL0Pi6/fHiWdytI3RVt21PQ8mBeTmLOMC8MbM0
pocwOG6+zYw=
=cu6u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: