[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded jade 1.1-5 (powerpc) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 16:47:44 -0500
Source: jade
Binary: sp-dev sp jade
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 1.1-5
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
Description: 
 jade       - James Clark's DSSSL Engine
 sp         - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
 sp-dev     - James Clark's SGML parsing library, developer support
Changes: 
 jade (1.1-5) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * set SGML_SEARCH_PATH_DEFAULT to /usr/lib/sgml:/usr/local/lib/sgml (was
     unset before, leading to wierd searching in /etc sometimes)
   * set SGML_CATALOG_FILES_DEFAULT to
     /usr/lib/sgml/catalog:/usr/local/lib/sgml/catalog
   * rebuild with egcs-2.90.26 980308, remove -fno-implicit-templates,
     which means Alpha platform should compile out of the box, linked
     against libstdc++2.8 as well
   * fixing dependancies:  sp shouldn't depend on itself, sp-dev now
     depends on sync'd version of sp, jade depends on sync'd version of sp;
     I think tight coupling is there between jade and sp.  I might loosen
     it later.
   * call ldconfig in sp's postinst, as stipulated by David Engel
   * don't build SP tools with -fpic, you silly!
Files: 
 31880831226d661510c6291d04afb406 948152 text optional sp_1.3-1.1-5_powerpc.deb
 a5deae86885444a8434a5c92011ac2f2 1088364 text optional sp-dev_1.3-1.1-5_powerpc.deb
 49bbadac2098d3d719719add823e9bbd 600706 text optional jade_1.1-5_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNT/gkAoYIlYX1XaBAQF4ugP/cqLXDZHl+OceWEagCXtiazJrnd83WwHK
RkVd8HGA6hp6t82StJaRTNRVDZFbKX/G0N7r7iu3oFuIrF/+xi0Wlqmcs2QXT9NV
4f/amp6pVYmR6bY/O13apnD0JyCtU0G0CPSryKOX3MhguGccL9J3MeT1k74GUuOt
NyEudeQ9jR0=
=SjoO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: