[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded slang 0.99.38-2.16 (sparc) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 15:36:46 +0100
Source: slang
Binary: slang0.99.34-dev slang0.99.38 slang0.99.38-pic slang0.99.34 slang0.99.38-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.99.38-2.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Delaunay <delaunay@lix.polytechnique.fr>
Description: 
 slang0.99.34 - backward compatibility shared library for libc5 S-Lang binaries
 slang0.99.34-dev - S-Lang libc5 backward compatibility development kit
 slang0.99.38 - The S-Lang programming library, shared library for use with libc6
 slang0.99.38-dev - The S-Lang programming library, development kit for use with libc
 slang0.99.38-pic - The S-Lang programming library, shared library subset kit.
Changes: 
 slang (0.99.38-2.16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Remove /usr/lib/libslang.so.0 -> libslang.so.0.99.38 which old versions
     installed, as it has now become dangling (#17413).
   * Fixed lintian-detected no-copyright-file.
Files: 
 9cec731328561131be662491e066e3c2 89904 oldlibs extra slang0.99.34_0.99.38-2.16_sparc.deb
 b87b26f95cf03e1ec4e53eb20367c6b4 116104 oldlibs extra slang0.99.34-dev_0.99.38-2.16_sparc.deb
 e282f3ca51c444ba2598002e2096ce40 91412 libs required slang0.99.38_0.99.38-2.16_sparc.deb
 0af74e2aa2a18596ec542fa08b26f23d 192966 devel optional slang0.99.38-dev_0.99.38-2.16_sparc.deb
 433972749a2800891fb6b732f527b5fe 138594 devel extra slang0.99.38-pic_0.99.38-2.16_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNNEO5I3wRg1tC8FBAQHMSgQAmMEXaOw6Jz4bM+ec+G9RFGQuOz1PyeB+
GmHaH9O4/lT47r51LR/ruVHr2BtggGALvBhWRCfY2A/APVYG6mXXRVsT14kG6rH1
bdeTzw283V4mcVYFQCHjUJDDUkjFySY8Ynv+CiIdigblFz4n4k9U2NtsyKHUeP2F
yue2zIHxvzs=
=Nb1D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: