Uploaded mc-4.1.24-1 (i386 binary & source) to master
Currently MC is distributed with the priority "extra", but since it is
such a powerful tool for simplifying system administration tasks i'd
like to see it distributed with priority "standard" instead.
Do you approve of this idea?
Greetings, P. *8^)
PS: Reply-To set to debian-devel.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 18:32:55 +0100
Source: mc
Binary: mc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.1.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Seelig <pseelig@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
Description:
mc - Midnight Commander - A powerful file manager.
Changes:
mc (4.1.24-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release version
* Binary package now smaller because upstream maintainer truncated
the src/Changelog file which has grown far too large over time. ;-)
* Changed "Architecture: i386" to "Architecture: any" in control file.
This addresses and closes bug #17226 as reported by James Troup.
Files:
44592c1700597c16ee996a1731eb140a 684 misc extra mc_4.1.24-1.dsc
461a0598351860f5ffb189ba9e2d6a36 1141034 misc extra mc_4.1.24.orig.tar.gz
55f404670b7df34f92079d1c691fd718 4478 misc extra mc_4.1.24-1.diff.gz
7e7a0f20cdbd2cefc775209700a2f969 352256 misc extra mc_4.1.24-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: 'finger -l pseelig@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de' for public key.
iQCVAwUBNMf/cegqiw1XE3/lAQEgOgP/ahhF1+EdAIQgcC9OVKM9q90my9DNn6VO
c0e0Eg+sLQa/Z7DZ8lokyIVA//aWzTrFoH5LVxZ+F5tI1SaVk9SITygtjkovgz8k
LMEXHRDi4e+aZWXfd99MDMReFwbzV4zZfozYS9LBoAMPyAoTh5jk9NF+TklFQFw1
+Rep2o2ONeA=
=2fab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Paul Seelig pseelig@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
My Homepage in the WWW at the URL http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: