[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

e2fsprogs 1.10-8 shows problem with deps ?



Could someone have a look at e2fsprogs 1.10-8 (in Incoming on master) ?
It seems to me that the upgrade procedure from 1.10-7 shows a
problem with dpkg's handling of dependencies, but I'm not sure the
problem doesn't come from me...

Here's what happens:

e2fsprogs_1.10-7 depends on comerr2_1.10-7
(only package depending on comerr2)

e2fsprogsg_1.10-8 depends on comerr2g_1.10-8
		  replaces/conflicts e2fsprogs

comerr2g replaces/conflicts comerr2

e2fsprogs, e2fsprogsg, comerr2g are all essential packages, comerr2 is
not.


When asking to upgrade the whole, after flagging all 1.10-7 packages
for purge, dpkg barfs when asked to install comerr2g:

- it says it is OK to remove e2fsprogs
- then it says it cannot remove comerr2, without saying why. Maybe it
forgot it just decided to remove essentail package e2fsprogs ?


Nonetheless, installing e2fslibsg does remove e2fsprogs, after which
removal installing comerr2g works fine.

Is this really a flaw in dpkg, or did I wrote something wrong ?

-- 
Yann Dirson  <ydirson@a2points.com>      | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
alt-email:     <dirson@univ-mlv.fr>      |     support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email:   <dirson@debian.org>      |         more powerful, more stable !
http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 |
                    -----------------------------------------
                    A computer engineer's looking for a job !
                    -----------------------------------------


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: