[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spamdb 1.0 (source all) uploaded to master.debian.org



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 11:32:13 +1100
Source: spamdb
Binary: spamdb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
Description: 
 spamdb     - Fully automated building and maintaining of a Blacklist
Changes: 
 spamdb (1.0) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer
   * added an exclusion list feature to exclude (by regexp) from the block lists
   * added support for blocking on email address as well as domain name
   * added stub for future blocking by IP address (network/netmask)
   * added support for Claus Assman's sendmail check_mail hacks
   *
   * removed dependancy on ed.
   *
   * removed emphasis on exim (exim is still supported)
   *
   * removed attempt to reconfigure exim from postinst.  IMO that is a
   * local sysadmin policy decision. spamdb is just a tool to help build
   * up filter lists.
   *
   * spamdb is now modular and extensible.
   * easy to add support for:
   * - new sources of spam domain lists
   * - new converter scripts (to output spamdb into format for use by mailer)
   *
   * contributed scripts are more than welcome. i want to support every
   * MTA available but can't run them all. comments and suggestions
   * are welcome too.
Files: 
 58275517af26deffbaf210495f6f226f 453 mail optional spamdb_1.0.dsc
 dbc4ca00c1a98216f6fa9dd716ed964d 6122 mail optional spamdb_1.0.tar.gz
 6ed252f8dcd368515b1e24b5183416bb 7192 mail optional spamdb_1.0_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQBVAwUBNHaOErJlCttJVuTpAQHC+AH+I+7bL7cTyPsLzKSFRd+iaB78IqRhpb8m
TWDFa7HIpuTWz7GHA5lXVA7aPYsywS4qlkr8XYqRSfIhfoMNwIvKKw==
=/jD5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: