[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

BitKeeper license not just a theoretical problem



Thanks to Lukas Geyer for coming up with this link.  The specific
message regarding Ben Collins is now appearing on linux-kernel archives.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103384262016750&w=2

Note the degree of personal animus involved here in Larry McVoy of
BitMover's "reasonable opinion".

I reiterate: in this atmosphere it is very dangerous for you or your
organization to assume that you can exercise the gratis license terms
for BitKeeper.  If you do not have a paid license, BitMover may consider
you in violation of the license on BitKeeper.

Thanks for your attention.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    when they take over a country is to
branden@debian.org                 |    outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks

Attachment: pgpg8jPqsYSbK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: