[ Posted as requested by Courtesy Raphaël Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> ]
[ Please respect the reply-to debian-project@l.d.o ]
Hello,
I have proposed the following general resolution a few days ago (my
initial mail to debian-devel-announce didn't get through). The
discussion takes place on debian-project@lists.debian.org
I already have the five required "seconds" (but you can still second it
if you want).
Please read what has already been said there before eventually
replying :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2001/debian-project-200110/threads.html
In particular my clarification message :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2001/debian-project-200110/msg00103.html
Thanks,
buxy.
PROPOSED GENERAL RESOLUTION
IRC AS A DEBIAN COMMUNICATION CHANNEL
1. Context
A #debian-devel operator regularly kicks (sometimes bans) people from the
channel if they are not Debian developers. He does so even if
they have been introduced by developers as valuable Debian contributors
and behave correctly in the channel.
The invoked reason is historic. #debian-devel used to be for developers
only and from time to time issues discussed on
debian-private@lists.debian.org are discussed on #debian-devel. Even the
channel founders argued about the policy that should be applied to
#debian-devel.
Other facts :
- #debian-private exists and is key protected (the key should be known
by debian developers only), although it is not really used
- #debian-devel is useful for many people and is useful for Debian
contributors (not yet developers) :
* the topic regularly asks for testers of prerelease of some packages
* the topic usually warns about the worst problems of unstable
* future developers can learn many things by following the discussions
- #debian-devel is used for day to day work related to Debian's
development
2. Problems
* The IRC channels #debian-* are not officially recognized as part of
Debian's communication channels.
* Debian can't treat valuable contributors like it's done actually on IRC.
Kicking a person who naturally has its place within the developer's
community (because of his interest and his work) is not reasonable.
(Personal note: this kind of behavior gives Debian its bad image of a
closed community preaching openness)
* Debian's philosophy concerning the development has always been to open
the communication channels. There's a mismatch here.
3. Proposed changes
We should ackowledge the fact the IRC channels are used to communicate
within Debian. They are only an alternate way to discuss things. They
are not the main communication channels (the mailing lists are). This
should be documented in Debian Developers Reference and wherever it's
applicable.
By acknowledging their existence, we also have to apply the usual Debian
policies :
- all #debian-* channels on OpenProjects should be open to everyone
except #debian-private which is for registered debian developers only
(the actual "key protection" may be replaced by a better identification
mechanism at any time)
- the "netiquette" (RFC 1855, section 4.1.2) applies, channels'
subjects should be respected
Nevertheless, some specific IRC rules apply :
- the channels should not be publicly archived without notice
- public quotations may not be accepted by everyone
4. Item proposed to vote (after the discussion period)
[ ] I accept the ratification of IRC channels as a communication medium
and as such they have to follow the usual Debian policies (adapted
for IRC habits)
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Le bouche à oreille du Net : http://www.beetell.com
Naviguer sans se fatiguer à chercher : http://www.deenoo.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Attachment:
pgpQvK_bdJ9Jc.pgp
Description: PGP signature