Re: emacs 20.5a uploading (Possibly important Y2K fixes).
tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Did you miss Miles Bader's correct message about emacs version
> numbering?
No. His email prompted my question. I didn't realize he was *sure*,
and I wanted to double check before I go make irreversable (well
without using epochs) changes in the Debian package.
The real problem was that I didn't notice the release of 20.5 until
20.5a was available. If I had seen 20.5, then I wouldn't have been
confused. I must not be on the right emacs list for announcements...
> Emacs 20.5a IS newer than emacs 20.5.
Thanks.
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
Reply to: