Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 12:54:30 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991217125430.R30803@zork.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.A41.4.21.9912171250590.24910-100000@kleopatra.acc.umu.se>; from David Weinehall on Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 12:55:24PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 87n1ra3dme.fsf@alexanderwohl.complete.org> <[🔎] Pine.A41.4.21.9912171250590.24910-100000@kleopatra.acc.umu.se>

Quoting David Weinehall slightly out of context:
> XEmacs requires X

	WRONG.

-- 
CrackMonkey.Org - Non-sequitur arguments and ad-hominem personal attacks

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
  - From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>
- Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
  - From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>

References:
- Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
  - From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
- Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
  - From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>

Prev by Date: Re: [apt] Sets of packages that run the same command.
Next by Date: want to maintain package distributed-net
Previous by thread: Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
Next by thread: Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread