Re: ssh mutation

[uwd38znr@umail.furryterror.org (Amy Fong)]

In article <19991107094612.F1325@lappy.djj.state.va.us>,
Ben Collins  <bcollins@debian.org> wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 08:34:46AM -0600, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
>> I'm afraid I have to respectfully disagree.  Running `apt-get upgrade'
>> yesterday replaced my existing ssh with openssh... in addition, the
>> downloaded debfile was `ssh_1.2pre7-1.deb'.  It seems that the
>> documentation refers to it as openssh, but it was installed into the
>> archives under the name ssh.
>> 
>> On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 10:51:44PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>> > Looking at the install, openssh was given that as a package name.
>> > Basically what we have now is "ssh" being a non-package, and ssh-nonfree
>> > and openssh supplying it. There is no bad upgrade in this instance, so
>> > there is nothing to rant about.
>
>Did it break anything?
>
>Ben

Actually it did break things on my two systems. In my ssh_config file, I
have an entry:

Host ....
   Cipher idea

Anyways, it complains: Bad cipher, changing it to blowfish fixes it.

Amy