Brian Mays <brian@debian.org> wrote:
> Once 2.2.12 makes it out of Incoming, we will have 8 kernel versions in
> the unstable distribution? Do we REALLY need to provide that many
> versions of the kernel??
>
> I hate to complain, but every time a new version of the PCMCIA modules
> is released, I have to build a set of packages for EACH of these
> kernels. It's starting to become a real pain in the ass.
>
> Can't we keep the number down to something more manageable, say 4 at
> most?
We now have:
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.0.35
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.0.36
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.1
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.5
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.7
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.9
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.10
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.12
My suggestion would be:
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.0.38
kernel-{doc,headers,image,source}-2.2.12
Can anybody provide arguements against just having two kernels?
--
I consume, therefore I am
Attachment:
pgpom442tsdBn.pgp
Description: PGP signature