Re: /opt/ again (was Re: FreeBSD-like approach for Debian? [was:
>>>Steve Lamb wrote:
> Sure I can. Now, *YOU* tell *ME* why you can't see the similarities
> between /usr/local and /usr/opt in the above scenerio. I mean, if /usr is
If it wan't for that the rest of the Unix univere in about 20 years ago
started to use the /opt mhiracy for this you should been right /opt and
/usr/op don't matter. But now we have to think about interopability and
shuch things too. /var I alsom think is a bad name, and i alson think
most of the stuff in /etc maybe should bet better named /cfg and then
maybe /host/cfg, /site/cfg that should have been a loot better names but
then everything shuold also have to change...
/ Balp
Reply to: