Re: ash vs. bash

["Steve Lamb" <morpheus@rpglink.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>There is probably more to do. I don't know if it is worth it.

    Well, if ash is smaller and faster it will help on smaller systems while
not impacting larger systems in any negative manner.  That seems, to me, to
be worth it.  I moved to ash as my /bin/sh on my laptop because I wanted to
save as much space and power as possible, another system that would benefit.

    I'd really hate to see something remain in place just because of laziness
when a clear alternative with little, if any, negatives is presented.

- -- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc

iQA/AwUBN5NhLHpf7K2LbpnFEQLtEwCg3tjpdVrKs8Tcid6o31COpfGdwNwAn1Cc
SS7z/vk95eAex5fpz46vwVzn
=9Sxj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----