Re: Bug#35092: Release-critical Bugreport

To: Debian Developerslist <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#35092: Release-critical Bugreport
From: Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de>
Date: 30 May 1999 04:44:33 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 871zfz5l9q.fsf@haitech.martin.home>
In-reply-to: Dirk Eddelbuettel's message of "Sat, 29 May 1999 22:18:13 -0400 (EDT)"
References: <19990529181409.A1436@portaloo.> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990529231950.12401B-100000@rd1936.quicknet.nl> <[🔎] 19990530010512.A15796@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <[🔎] 14160.40881.658225.136972@sonny.econ.queensu.ca>

>> "DE" == Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> writes:

Martin> I remember Soenke cursing about libc6 behaving different than
Martin> libc5 turning Smail maintenance into a real pain.

DE> So doesn't that mean that it is time to make exim our standard mailer ?

Ehm, it is already. Exim is priority important, smail is priority
extra.

Ciao,
	Martin

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport
  - From: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>
- Re: Release-critical Bugreport
  - From: Remco Blaakmeer <remco-blaakmeer@quicknet.nl>
- Re: Bug#35092: Release-critical Bugreport
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: Bug#35092: Release-critical Bugreport
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Does anyone still have rvplayer_5.0-10.deb around?
Next by Date: Re: ip-{up,down} scripts
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#35092: Release-critical Bugreport
Next by thread: Re: Release-critical Bugreport
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread