Re: Bug #32888: I think this is a bug in apt.

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: 32888@bugs.debian.org, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug #32888: I think this is a bug in apt.
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:20:02 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990306002002.A5963@rising.com.au>
Mail-followup-to: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, 32888@bugs.debian.org, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990305131713.2130A-100000@cantor.unex.es>; from Santiago Vila on Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 01:19:05PM +0100
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990305131713.2130A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 01:19:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> How can you ensure that removing an essential package (be it base or
> gzip) does not hose the system? (It will certainly do, by definition of
> essential).

I thought that we agreed to have one of the current packages edit
dpkg's database somehow so that removing base would not be so bad.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD              hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug #32888: I think this is a bug in apt.
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: CDs: where are we up to?
Next by Date: Re: Corel and Debian [sound config?]
Previous by thread: Re: Bug #32888: I think this is a bug in apt.
Next by thread: Re: Bug #32888: I think this is a bug in apt.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread