Re: Conflicting packages not of extra priority.
I wrote:
> Don't you need an exception for c/p/r's and such?
Jules Bean writes:
> No. They're new versions, essentially. New versions with different
> names.
> If A c/p/r B, then B will either be removed from the dist (the common
> case) or moved to extra (if there is a reason that some people might
> prefer B).
I realize that. However, someone earlier was complaining that Santiago's
interpretation must be wrong because it would force packages that c/p/r
into Extra, and this is obviously wrong. The fact that he was able to
misinterpret it this way implies to me that it isn't entirely clear.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: