Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep

[Patrice Fortier <Patrice.Fortier@u-bordeaux3.fr>]

Le mar 23/03/2004 à 15:15, Thiemo Seufer a écrit :
> Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> schrieb:
> > >
> > >> I see there's some new gnustep packages with overly-generic names.
> > >>
> > >> Is there a reason why these aren't all prefixed with `gnustep-' or `gs-'
> > >> or something?
> > >
> > > Err, no - please don't use gs. That's ghostscript.
> > 
> > Well, gs is ghostscript. But the proposal is to use gs as prefix, not
> > as name.
> 
> Like in:
> gs-common
> gs-esp
> gs-cjk-resource

which for lot of people will mean ghostscript-common etc.
Is these are gnustep packages, it will be quite disturbing...

Patrice.