On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:06:23AM +0000, Adam Majer wrote: [snip] > If someone is MIA, then instead of just taking over one package, you > should O: all of their packages AFAIK. Hrm. Well, a check over the bug list does show that Moshe has not responded to any bugs since 14 May 2003. He hasn't been seen by db.debian.org at all recently. And, he's got unacknowledged NMUs for roughly half his packages. I guess that meets my definition of MIA. Anyone disagree? Moshe, here's the way it's going to go: if I don't hear from you within about two weeks (let's say 13 May, since I may be at a BSP that weekend) I will orphan all of your packages, setting the maintainer to the Debian QA group. I would really rather not do this, but Adam is right - there's no point in us pretending that you're still maintaining these packages. I will orphan the following packages: cgitb ditty kiss plwm pms python-xlib slides sted twisted zwm I will specifically NOT orphan these packages, which are co-maintained: lilo-installer elilo-installer grub-installer Now is the time to speak up if you want to keep these packages! Thanks, KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgpDKaeiK2jBp.pgp
Description: PGP signature