On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:35:27PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [040219 16:10]:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:54:03AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:24:25 +1000, Anthony Towns
> > > >On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:41:04PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > >> No, Goswin is right here; there's an important difference. Developing dpkg
> > > >> requires primarily coding skills. Running wanna-build requires almost
> > > >> entirely communication and coordination skills
> > > >I'm sorry, but you're wrong.
> > > Proof by authority?
> Sorry, but this seems a mis-understanding to me. Nathanael spoke about
> running wanna-build, whereas you spoke about running "the buildds".
Yes. wanna-build is only there as part of the buildd network, as is the
buildd.debian.org site, as is the accepted autobuilding support in dak,
as are the buildds themselves. It's certainly possible to talk about
these things separately, but they aren't remotely independent.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature