Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:25:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040117162500.GA13690@dat.etsit.upm.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040113162956.GR1514@alcor.net>
References: <[🔎] 20040111195339.GI15281@erizo.shearer.org> <[🔎] 20040112055851.GM1436@alcor.net> <[🔎] 20040113122021.GB9011@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20040113162956.GR1514@alcor.net>

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:29:56AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> This sounds interesting; perhaps someone could send a short summary of the
> activities there after the meeting is over.

Or even a good status update to the "Debian-Java FAQ" [1] which I've asked 
for (#156547) but never arrived :-(

Regards

Javi


[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Dan Shearer <dan@shearer.org>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <leader@debian.org>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: wishlist, Re: packages.debian.org lives again
Next by Date: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread