Re: very strange soname for libaal

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: very strange soname for libaal
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 01:48:11 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ekuzmo50.wl@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031220152548.GA15392@filibusta.crema.unimi.it>
References: <[🔎] 20031220152548.GA15392@filibusta.crema.unimi.it>

> 
> how can i name the libaalXXX package? maybe libaal-0.4-13?
> or libaal-0.413 (strictly appying rule in Debian Policy 8.1)?

Try libaal0.4-13.

See other packages such as libatk1.0-0 


regards,
	junichi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: very strange soname for libaal
  - From: Domenico Andreoli <cavok@libero.it>

References:
- very strange soname for libaal
  - From: cavok@filibusta.crema.unimi.it (Domenico Andreoli)

Prev by Date: Re: Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, utilizing it in debian/rules clean
Next by Date: Re: very strange soname for libaal
Previous by thread: very strange soname for libaal
Next by thread: Re: very strange soname for libaal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread