I think the distinction between sid RC bugs and all RC bugs was removed at some point, without telling us. Take a look at the gjdoc package - there are two RC bugs tagged sarge and one tagged sid, but the testing scripts are not upgrading the version in testing, even though it would close two rc bugs and reduce the number of rc bugs for sarge. On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 01:13:23AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > The thing is that #215314 has tag: sid bacause it only applies to > unstable version (upstream release is on its way and will close it). > > Version in testing is clean and robust and I wouldn't want it to be > at some point removed from testing because of a bug in unstable. > > So - shouldn't there be [U] mark for this bug? sth. like: -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh@debian.org | mh@tildemh.com | mh344@cam.ac.uk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature