Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:34:09AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski <tretkowski@inittab.de> writes:
> > * Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> - testing, unstable or Debian 3.0 with backports aren't suitable for
> >> production systems
> >
> > Of course it is, Debian 3.0 with a few _selected_ backports works
> > nice, also on production systems.
>
> Err, do you realize you're telling that to the person that maintains the
> largest collection of woody backports, including probably the few
> selected ones you're using? If he's saying they aren't suitable for
> production systems, you should take his word for it.
I dunno, as the maintainer of the woody subversion backport I'd be quite
happy to recommend it for use on production systems. (Insofar as
subversion is ready for production use at all, that is; but I don't
expect the backport to destabilize the rest of your system, which is the
most important thing.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: