Re: propose new virtual package: libxaw-dev

[Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>]

On 19-Sep-03, 15:25 (CDT), "Craig P. Steffen" <craig@craigsteffen.net> wrote: 
> This doesn't say "must declare a dependency on a real package".  If that's 
> somewhere else in the policy, then please let us know.

The fact that something isn't in policy doesn't mean it's not a bug. (Yeah,
way too many negatives in that sentence, let's try it again:) Not all bugs
are listed in policy. (There, that's better.) 

Is there some reason that you seriously object to specifying a real
package before the virtual? Or are you just being difficult?

Fix the damn bug and move on.

Steve

-- 
Steve Greenland
    The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
    system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
    world.       -- seen on the net