[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken



On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:02:33PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I think that either a large warning on bugs.d.o about the use of C-R
> systems in corrspondence, or a similar warning in the description of
> TMDA would suffice.  I am not familiar with TMDA, so I may be wrong, but
> couldn't it be shipped with a default of not issuing a C-R, and have a
> note in README.Debian about how to do enable it, with the caveat that
> using C-R for BTS correspondence will likely result in ignored bug
> reports and problems for the project?

Stephen,

TMDA does not ship with any defaults, except a couple of customizable
text files (templates).  It is entirely up to the user to create a TMDA 
configuration along with his own whitelist and filter directives.

TMDA is actually not just a C-R system.  C-R is only part of the system.  It
is also has a very powerful and configurable mail filter, and it is also a
Mail Delivery Agent.  You can read about the features of TMDA at
http://tmda.net/features.html

I don't have a problem with adding documentation, in fact I had already
planned on adding a note to README.Debian on the next release listing the
addresses that the user should be sure to whitelist if he expects to be able
to communicate with the BTS.

--Adam
-- 
Adam McKenna  <adam@debian.org>  <adam@flounder.net>



Reply to: