Re: Accepted gdesklets-data 0.13.1 (all source)
christophe barbe <christophe@cattlegrid.net> writes:
> Is it a common practice to use this kind of numbering (without a second part after
> a dash) for what I presume is a debian-made tarball (multiple upstream tarballs
> put together).
>
> gdesklets-data_0.13.1_all.deb
>
> Also (related) why not use a orig.tar.gz file?
> My understanding is that the difference between 0.13.1 and 0.13, because
> only the README.Debian has changed, it would have been a good thing to
> base it on the previous tarball.
Yes, gdesklets-data is a debian native package (ie: there is no upstream
tarball corresponding to this archive).
-n version are revision on a same upstream tarball, but in this case we
don't have any .orig.tar.gz ....
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Reply to: