[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Having more than one key in the Debian keyring



On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:11:10PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:

> 
> The point was that, if you're asking to replace a key in the keyring
> beacuse of problems with the way you managed it previously, it would be
> a good idea to present an explanation to the keymaster.  The keymaster's
> job is not to facilitate arbitrary key changes; it's to protect the
> keyring from being compromised, while ensuring that trusted keys can be
> used to upload packages into the archive.  This suggests that *not*
> accepting key replacements without a pretty strong reason is a sensible
> policy to follow, and that you're more likely to have things go your way
> if you give the keymaster a reason to believe your request is worth
> paying attention to.  In contrast, "finding my brand new GPG key policy
> on the WWW is left as an exercise to the reader" doesn't seem to me like
> an effective use of the keymaster's time.


Actually, good key management policy states that every so often, you
*should* throw away your key and generate a new one from scratch.
Even if you're perfect (tm), something may have happened that you
didn't expect.... a very clever adversary could have carried out a
black-bag job on your computer, having installed a keyboard tap to
grab passwords and then trojan horsed your GPG binary, etc.

The claim that you should never have to replace a key on the keyring
if you've been a good little doobie is so silly has to be completely
laughable.

						- Ted



Reply to: