Re: NM non-process
Marcelo Magallon said:
> You mean you actually think James can even consider the possibility of
> handing the management of the keyring over?
Well, he should. He'll have to someday, such as when he dies. (Unless
he is actually immortal, or more likely if Debian is utterly destroyed
first.)
According to the Debian Constitution, he only has mastery over the
keyring because he's a "Delegate" appointed by the DPL. You seem to
be saying that he should treat it as his personal property, or perhaps
a God-given right. That's just odd. It can't be what you meant, can
it? :-)
Of course he has a right (and duty) to be concerned about who manages
the keyring, and to give his opinion about that to the DPL (even if his
opinion is that he is the only one who can be trusted), but that's
not what you said.
--
Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
Reply to: