Josip Rodin wrote: > There's still Exim 3. I agree that having to switch to a text-only program > rather than another instance of debconf is visually unappealing and likely > hindering for automated installations, and that it is software that's dead > upstream, but Exim 3's exim.conf files are reasonably well done, it's not > hard to keep pressing enters for newbies, and the whole process and > documentation are obviously better tested than with the new Exim. > > Which isn't to say that Exim 4 can't improve to become perfectly suitable, > or that e.g. Postfix can't improve to become perfectly suitable[1], but > there's no reason to make these decisions months before the release even > looks near. So you're sayng that exim4 is not well enough tested relative to exim3, but that we can just wait to get it tested until just before release. Hm. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
pgpFsY1i7FJHF.pgp
Description: PGP signature