Re: how to package Haskell libraries
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:07:05PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Right, but that approach definitely has some disadvantages, namely
> fragility and the fact that we're kind of subverting the whole idea of
> binary packages.
It kind of depends on what "Haskell library" means. Is it more like a
C library (potentially complex build system, dependencies, etc) or is
it more like a Perl module? Nobody in their sane mind would propose to
build XS modules on the user's system, but Python folks seems to be
happy about having their pyc and pyo files generated in the postinst.
Marcelo
Reply to: