[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymore



Andreas Barth wrote:
> * "Martin v. Löwis" (martin@v.loewis.de) [030622 11:50]:
> 
>>problem here (C++ ABI compatibility with other Linux distributions). The 
>>discussion is now about *how* to fix this bug:
>>1. just bump minimum supported i386-family processor to i486
> 
> 1a. like 1, but just for c++-packages.
As has been pointed out many times before and in this thread, dropping c++
support for i386 is much like dropping support completely, as important base
packages (e.g. apt [0]) depend on it.

Cheers

T.

0. According to the priority and section, of course.

Attachment: pgpjnYGiPGGRW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: