Re: Every spam is sacred
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:18:49 +1000, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> said:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > There is no excuse for this. Access to servers that are not in
>> > spam lists is well available to Debian developers. I tunnel my
>> > outgoing mail through a server in Melbourne no matter where I am,
>> > this avoids all issues of spam blocking by IP address. I offered
>> > accounts on a choice of machines to be used for such purposes for
>> > any Debian developers who have no better options, but so far
>> > no-one has taken me up on this offer.
>>
>> I refuse to allow spammers this victory. My machines are fully
>> capable members of the internet, and I deliver my own email. My
>> philosophy is that if people drop mail from me due to incompetence
>> (since setting up machines to classify email from me as spam is
>> indeed a misconfiguration), then I have no real desire to impose my
>> musings on them.
> If your machines are fully capable then they will have permanent IP
> addresses and no spam ever coming from them. In which case they
> will never get listed in a DNSBL (*) and there is nothing to be
> concerned about.
They are, when I send mail from home, or when I trael to the
office. However, I often send mail from the road (or the internet
cafe) where dhcp often rules.
manoj
--
"The only way for a reporter to look at a politician is down."
H.L. Mencken
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: