[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?



On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:03:45AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:19:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > FWIW, the next version of spamassassin (2.60) will have no forgeable
> > negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)
> 
> Just out of curiosity, how will this be accomplished?

The only negative rules will be: bayesian rules, bondedsender and
habeas. Figuring how to autolearn ham (non-spam) is the only obstacle
we still need to figure out.

-- 
Duncan Findlay

Attachment: pgpbx6TSl8ZZo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: