[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: fewer vim variants



On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

 > What about a version _with_ all non-threaded interpreters, but
 > _without_ gtk2/kde support?

 Foul beast!  Stand back!  Thou shallst not inflict that hideous reptile
 unto my vim!

 :-)

 -m.

 PS: I'd very much like to know what "non-threaded interpreters" means,
     too.



Reply to: