Re: RFC: fewer vim variants

[Ava Arachne Jarvis <ajar@katanalynx.dyndns.org>]

[Luca Filipozzi - Sat, 14 Jun 2003 03:00:44 PM CDT]
> I propose to have only the following:
>   vim  (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
>   kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde support; no docs)
>   gvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; gtk2 support; no docs)
>   vim-doc
> 
> Let me know if this rubs you the wrong way.

Sounds cool to me --- as long as they don't conflict with each other
(like the current vim packages do now).


-- 
| BOFH excuse #220:
|
| Someone thought The Big Red Button was a light switch.